- Re: Questions on faster than light
Sam Spin creates inertia,and inertia and gravity are the same. My fast
pictures speak a thousand words and are virtually impossible to fake
When shown at MIT faking was never said. You would not give my shadow
reality Bert
- Re: Ron Mallet's time machine
news:3cgrk.463$5C.115@trnddc02...
It's clock stopped.
- Re: What is the evidence that electrons attract protons?
BURT wrote:
Ever hear of free electrons?
- Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
--- ahahahaha... tthe scent of herring... AHAHAHAHA.. ----
[link]
I bought some dried CSP chips,
( Chinese sweet potatoes )
and all they did for me was give me gas.
How would a windbag like Potter know the difference?
... Easy, Richard... easy.... ahahaha
- Re: Ron Mallet's time machine
He went back in time to when he invented it to tell himself that it
would not work.
- Re: If we keep digging hole on Earth? What will happen?
Interesting, to think of all the power, beyond geo-thermal available
by taping into the lava heat itself, not only for energy but also for
melting about anything or super-heating things.
[link]
[link]
[link]
- Re: If we keep digging hole on Earth? What will happen?
Already an idiot. Hey stooopid - you cannot drill into taffy. Not
even if you are a Russkie doing the Moho. 10 megabucks for drilling
exploration is piddles.
Idiot.
[snip rest of crap]
All the souls in Hell will erupt through the white-hot hole to be
enslaved at the surface by cleared Thetans. In vorpal shackles they
- Re: Free Electron Lasers, Conjugate mirrors and the Entangement paradox
Hi.
You obviously understand FEL operation (and Maxwell).
I have a question that I never could get a figure for by
exploring sites.
Do you happen to know the highest frequency coherent
beam produced with currently active FELs.
Thanks
André Michaud
- Re: Why the Physics Law holds good?
OK, git - show us how to build a skyscraper starting at the third
floor.
All physical theory has perfectly survived attempted empirical
falsfication. If you have something different that is not
degenerately identical, don't be shy about telling us. If you
contradict prior observation in any venue at any scale, you are wrong.
- Empirical Beliefs & Hypothesis; Do they terminate in some beliefs that need no further justification, go on infinitely - on belief being justified by other that then need justification, or circle back upon itself in some way - constituting a sort of basic belief system in no more need of justification?
A central concept in science and the scientific method is that all
evidence must be empirical, or empirically based, that is, dependent
on evidence or consequences that are observable by the senses.
Empirical data are data that are produced by experiment or
observation.
"Empirical" as an adjective or adverb is used in conjunction with both
- Re: SOCK IT TO 'EM, DR. VELIKOVSKY
[snip 680 lines of crap]
If angular momentum is conserved Velikovsky is wrong. Your choice.
- Re: Galaxies disk clustering
LeoK wrote:
Except for spherical clusters.
Hey stooopid - spin a ball of pizza dough and you get a disk.
You are a babbling idiot. Any threading of magnetic fields in plasma
will give you swirlies.
A proof that LeoK cannot be trusted with a screwdriver.
- Re: Nothing New Under the Sun
Einstein is a stupid plagaruist! Einstein is WRONG but the Scientist
is the LIAR!
- Re: Why the Physics Law holds good?
What it really means is the gravitation law (made up by humings)
is a good model of the way nature behaves!
- Re: The world's first robot controlled exclusively by living brain tissue
Food is composed of nutrients which are chemicals capable of
interacting to provide energy that sustains a cycle of electrochemical
reactions as in neuronal function.
- Re: Ron Mallet's time machine
Relativistic travel into the future is just another bullshit
path relativity leads the clueless on.
Time travel itself, is complete utter bullshit, and nothing
more than such.
- Re: If we keep digging hole on Earth? What will happen?
Dear Sanny:
Closer than that some places...
All magma, no. Rock is one of those things that gets less dense when
it cools, but not all magma is more dense than the local rock, and
local rock is occasionally under enough of a load that magma can still
squirt.
Maybe.
Don't need a hole nearly that deep to get energy from the core.
- Re: Ron Mallet's time machine
One can "look" back in time. Look at the moon... you
see it as it was 1.3 seconds ago. We look back in time
with our telescope to study the history of the universe.
Give the current understanding of the way the universe
works, one cannot "travel" into the past.
[link]
- Re: The world's first robot controlled exclusively by living brain ?tissue
Fang is Rod Speed.
So Fang Rod Speed, tell us all how the parasail is just another kite and the
same as some kites that have been around "for millenium" as you said.
Push away from the monitor and learn up.
- Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
I don't want war. I was opposed to going into Afghanistan. I was
opposed to going into Iraq. When the twin towers were attacked I was
in favor of forgiving the people who did it.
But the reality is this: James 4:1 From whence comr wars and
fighting among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war
- Re: And You Think YOU Have Problems!
Braindead Ed, on 21 Aug 2008, in alt.atheism, decided this was a worthy use
of a keyboard:
Just when I think nobody could possibly take you any less seriously...
- Re: SOCK IT TO 'EM, DR. VELIKOVSKY
The only work of Velikovsky that I read was his essay on "50
Reasons There is No Gravity." He listed 50 phenomena which
contradicted the Newtonian theory of gravity. He dismisses general
relativity in passing, but his real attack is on the Newtonian law of
gravity. He showed incredible ignorance of science, arrogance toward
- If a law fails we create a new Law.
If you jump from 5 story building you will die.
Do you think you can jump and escape?
Only if you have wings you can fly.
Physics is only observation. And it may happen the physics rule
changes. And when it happens we create a new law.
Say 2 bodies comming to each other at speed v1 and v2. What is
relative speed between them v1+v2.
- Re: Questions on faster than light
On Aug 21, 10:21 am, "Spaceman"
wrote:
What "paradox problems 'fixes' "?
- Re: And You Think YOU Have Problems!
Indeed, yours are certainly worse than mine.
Pramer
- solutions manual
solutions manual
I am a solutions manual collector, I offer solutions manual ebook
services
Note:
all solutions manual in soft copy
that mean in Adobe Acrobat Reader (PDF ) format. if you want any book
not just solutions just contact with us。 to get the solution manual
you want ，please send message to
- Ron Mallet's time machine
What's the latest on Ron Mallet's time machine?
I saw the special on the Discovery channel a couple years ago. Looks
interesting.
- Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
Now this sort of thing is that makes you people dangerous.
You want war, don't you?
You want prophecy to be fulfilled - you want an Armaggeddon and you want
people to suffer eternal torture simply because they don't believe the same
crap you do.
You are all very, very sick in the head.
- If we keep digging hole on Earth? What will happen?
Google is spending 10 million dollars to use energy from Molten Lava
under the earth 10 Km deep.
If we keep drilling hole in earth we will meet lava at 10 Km deep.
With that hole allow all earth lava to come out as a volcano? Will
there be volvano eruption if we dig a hole of 10 km deep?
Google is digging 10 Km hole and using the heat energy of lava to
- And You Think YOU Have Problems!
<
[link]
[link]
<
This was the ugly scene this morning outside
the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C..
as David Iain Greig, moderator of talk.origins,
is shown outside the Smithsonian Institution
in a rather embarrassing situation.
- Re: Questions on faster than light
Actually, my "tilting at windmills" brings far more great accomplishements
that will use "real" science and will be far more interesting than the
rubber ruler
stuff that only creates more "bullshit" scifi, instead of Science non
fiction
that humans love because it turns out real.
As it is now, Relativity and QM are more like a deadend path.
- Re: Why the Physics Law holds good?
first of all thank you for your useful reply..
Actually the question was solidified in my mind when i was failed to
answer the question "2+2=4 Why" from our lecturer.
The question basically evolved as like this:
when an object is dropped it has to fall. That means it has to satisfy
the gravitational law.
- Re: Questions on faster than light
PD wrote:
No it does not.
And if it did it would simply find out that you get more info per second
when you move towards the wavesource.
It ignores the speed of the observer.
If the wave is still moving at c relative to the observer heading
towards the source, how does the observer collect more "wave" packets
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory if Gravity (DTG)
PD wrote:
Well put! Just to make sure: indeed our library "lacks" that journal.
Note: the suggestion that popularity proves much is erroneous, it's an
indication at best. A positive example has just been given by someone else,
and a negative example can be found here:
[link]
- Re: Questions on faster than light
It measures the speed of the wave through "aether"
It basically ignores the speed the ojects is moving across
the waves if the object is moving so it actually does not
measure the "relative" speed at all.
When you drive over a bumpy road, the bumps are "set" in the road.
They are set at 1 foot and there are 100 of them.
- How to expand quantum mechanical angular momentum.
Hello all,
I have some question about how to expand the angular momentum into certain
basis. Consider we have some angular momentum state with total angular
momentum l, we can select the basis as |l,mz>, which is the eigenstate of
Lz operator. But equivalently we can also select |l,mx> or |l,my> as the
- Re: Questions on faster than light
PD wrote:
No,
When you don't have to ignore the theory to support the theory, like you
have to do all the time, is when it has no problems to be fixed.
Too bad you always still need to ignore "some relative motion" to support
your stupid ass worshipping.
- Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
PD wrote:
So you just know for sure that there is nothing smaller even though
you are limited to seeing a certain "smallness".
You poor thing.
Prove it then!
Prove there is nothing smaller than the smallest thing we can see right now.
You are a fool PD.
You close your "science" doors and turn the building into a church.
- Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
So you really don't have a clue how clocks function?
- Re: Questions on faster than light
The sneering dork Phuckwit Duck is too much of a bigot to
learn anything. He bashes his relativity bible and that's all he
knows, if anyone else wants to discuss physics the cunt can
only sneer.
- Re: Questions on faster than light
You bit.
Drop a stone in a pond and watch the ripples. They look something
like this, except they decay:
[link]
The ocean surface has standing waves, the surfboard rider comes to
shore on a travelling wave.
When does a standing wave become a travelling wave?
- Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
You should study the laws of thermodynamics... which nature appears to
agree with. [link]
- Re: What is the evidence that electrons attract protons?
Mitch has reached close to the end of the 19th century.
Soon we can expect him to start moaning about the
discrepancy in the orbit of Mercury, and measuring
the speed of light using the moons of Jupiter.
Nope. The ground state of an electron in a Hydrogen atom is
the S state. It has zero angular momentum.
- Re: Why the Physics Law holds good?
Your word don't exactly convey a coherent train of thought.
Laws of physics are good models of phenomena in the universe
as long as observations agree with predictions of the laws and
theories. That's it.
In domains where applicable:
o Newton's laws of motion and gravitation
o Maxwell's electrodynamics
- Re: initial entropy
Leave it to a historian (Uffink) to deign to hold forth on Entropy (a
feature of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics) versus Time-
Reversibility (a feature of deterministic Cartesian systems).
The two concepts are from completely different and inherently
incompatible realms.
A clear case of elementary equivocation - apples vs oranges.
- Re: What is the evidence that electrons attract protons?
Conservation of angular momentum.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
- Re: initial entropy
Leave it to a historian (Uffink) to deign to hold forth on Entropy (a
feature of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics) versus Time-
Reversibility (a feature of deterministic Cartesian systems).
The two concepts are from completely different and inherently
incompatible realms.
A clear case of elementary equivocation - apples vs oranges.
- Why the Physics Law holds good?
The laws of nature or the Physics set out by the pioneers of the past
are the basic foundation of the all the theories and support for the
things that came after them.
And they observed it.through experimentations proved that it has got
some properties which are unique to that thing and certain things
- Re: The surface of the 4th dimension
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:13:36 -0700 (PDT), mike3
wrote:
Those other dimensions are compactified to less than a Planck Length,
or as the Bible puts it, "rolled up like a scroll." Gordon
- Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
news:ms7rk.252124$TT4.186144@attbi_s22...
I think, that the entropy in the universe does not increase. It is a
misconception to extent our experiences to cosmology, since what we regard
as useful energy means nothing on cosmic scales. It is our choice to run a
car and so we have to put gas into the tank to make it move, but on large
|
Newsgroups