Skip to content

sci.physics

Home arrow Newsgroups arrow sci.physics


sci.physics
Physical laws, properties, etc.

  • Re: Einstein was right (again) - Read and weep kooks
    [...]
    Way more than you'd think.

  • Re: Einstein was right (again) - Read and weep kooks
    Actually the only thing I'm in denial about is whether or not you're
    actually a robotic AI program or not, as people keep whispering. I take
    the time to come up with thoughtful answers to people, and you just cut
    and paste pre-formed snippets and sentences over and over again.
    In this case, you answered my reply to you, by just copying back your

  • Re: Relativity from North to South instead of East to West.
    This the first I've heard of that.

  • Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
    T1:
    M'-------->
    -\
    --\
    ---\
    ----\
    -----M
    T2:
    -----M'-------->
    -----|
    -----|
    -----|
    -----|
    -----M
    T3:
    ----------M'-------->
    ---------/
    --------/
    -------/
    ------/
    -----M
    There is no difference between the clocks being directly across from
    each other and one clock approaching, and then being directly across

  • Re: A question to Igor...
    -------------------------
    waht has random to do with it ??!!!
    again demagoghic obfuscatin!!
    do you think that you can divert the issue
    to nonsens direation:
    listen crook:
    in my experiment
    no mattwer how many phootns took action
    ALLOF THEM WERE ACTIVE LESS THAN A SECOND!!
    do you dent it ??
    you acivated the les torch for half a second

  • Re: Einstein was right (again) - Read and weep kooks
    If a fudge factor weren't consistent at all scales, then it wouldn't be
    a good fudge factor, would it?
    So what exactly is your point here? This paper is not saying anything
    that we don't already know about Abell 520. If you recall in our
    previous discussions about this, the problem is not that Ab520 doesn't

  • Re: A massive "current of fire" on the sun has started running at high speed
    And this:
    "Let's go deeper
    What researchers really need is a good look deep inside the sun.
    NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory, launched in February 2010, will
    provide that when its instruments come online later this year.
    SDO is able to map the sun's interior using a technique called
    helioseismology. SOHO can do the same thing, but not well enough to

  • BBC documentary about Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Dark Flow
    This seems to be a very well done documentary about the latest
    developments in cosmology, and the theories behind it. It even discusses
    the recently unveiled finding about some groups of galaxies flowing
    faster in one direction of the universe than others, called Dark Flow.
    The following is a Youtube video, I've only found one part of it on

  • Re: Researchers get plastic to act totally metal
    And it is certainly lighter than iron and platinum.
    --Mike r.

  • Re: The electron has substructure that radiates.
    ------------------
    even worse than that!
    it is flooded with moron gangsters
    and parrots
    like
    Inetial = Artful = who knows =
    anonymous
    that change their names each half a year !!!
    Y.P
    ------------------

  • Re: The electron has substructure that radiates.
    -------------------
    while i find dishonest people
    i become angge
    i am sure that you are more dishonest than
    idiot ...
    becauas i cant believe that
    people that have some academic degree
    can be so dumb as you
    (for so long .......)
    2
    while i find it even now!! in that post
    that you tried to divert my answer

  • Re: The electron has substructure that radiates.
    (:-)
    can you get all those 'properties' of yours
    without the existence of mass??
    !!!!
    2
    poeple knew a bit** more** than 130 years...
    that the sun is orbiting the earth...
    ANYONE COULD SEE IT "OBVIOUSLY "WITH HIS OWN EYES ....
    'people know it'
    is not a physics argument ......
    .Y.P
    ----------------------

  • 9-11 First Responders Bought Off as They Die from the Lie.
    All the closest witness will soon be dead.
    You can bet as part of their "settlement" they can never testify as to
    what they saw on the WTC site
    [link]

  • Ste's Marxist rubbish
    Ste wrote:
    And you think that is meaningful, don't you? Of course you do, and yet
    you deny that IQ in general does.
    Is that not what one would expect? Learning does make one smarter,
    just as training can make one a better athlete. But in both cases
    there is a genetic component that can't be changed.

  • Re: According to their plan, the first 2*3.5TeV collisions will be performed the 30-th of March. I’m scared, but can not do anything, - all ways lead to catastrophe. LHC/CERN.
    the knoledge its the standard model!
    it has to be verified by observation.
    no other cyclotron can reproduce
    as close as posible the conditions of the bb
    i can agree with you that there are many more
    creative ways to proceed when you have
    money limitations and that can be directly applied
    to engineering even when the results are not

  • Re: Was Einstein indeed "Very Great"?
    Miraculous Year (1905)
    Ref: [link]
    Adapted from "Five papers that shook the world"
    by Matthew Chalmers
    January 2005
    In 1905 an anonymous patent clerk in Bern rewrote
    the laws of physics in his spare time.
    Most physicists would be happy to make one
    discovery that is important enough to be taught to

  • Re: Europe was wrong I was right.
    If there are any gods around at all, they do a pretty good job of letting
    people die already.

  • Re: Was Einstein indeed "Very Great"?
    Einstein invented the word Quanta. Even if, so what? Rah-Rah Einstein!!
    Lil' Wayne invented the word "bling-bling". Are you going to worship him
    too?
    Having a "supporter" and making accomplishments are two different things.
    I don't know why you would even bring that up. It is irrelevant. People
    support other people for a variety of reasons, but people who have merit

  • Re: Europe was wrong I was right.
    Where did you do this? What was your basis for the claim?
    Oh yeah .. so that happened just the other day did it .. I must have missed
    my anhilation. :)
    All I saw was that they are planning a shutdown in 2 years time (not FOR two
    years) and this is just scheduled maintenance and to fix up some problems

  • Re: Peak Oil ... a scam and a con?.. . or not
    ... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
    "spudnik", the Potato head ,
    being between jobs, and loaded, as usual, "thus" wrote
    about "Fossilized ... oilolgical mythology piling-up to create
    continuously, time immemorial" intellectual potatoes of his ...
    because it was far above his pothead-horizon to comprehend

  • Re: Was Einstein indeed "Very Great"?
    I have no problem at all with SR. It is follows from electromagnetism and
    Maxwell's equations. Every prediction of SR save for length contraction
    has been proven experimentally. The vast bulk of the SR posts in
    sci.physics is a bunch of drivel that claims SR can't be right. The folks
    who make these claims are so ignorant of physics they don't realize they

  • Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
    Exactly .. which is why to measure the rate of a single moving clock you
    need to compare it with another clock. OR you have to take into account the
    time for the information about the clock (eg via light) to travel back the
    same observer ie.
    either
    S' M'----->
    S M1 M2
    S' M'----->

  • Re: Was Einstein indeed "Very Great"?
    On Mar 12, 11:05 am, Robert Higgins
    wrote:
    he seems to forget that max planck became einsteins
    greatest supporter and sponsor and that the word quanta
    came from einstein himself.
    the miracle years where the foundation of QM
    along with plancks work that was in contrast

  • Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
    M'----->
    M
    M'----->
    M
    If M' just went by M when do you think they are going to be facing
    each other a second time?

  • Re: Where the WTC Fairy Tale Starts - USAma in a Cave.
    so, what was the beef

  • Re: From Where the WTC Nutbaggery Starts - Delusional Mind of Ironhead
    And all we hear is about how sophisticated the distribution of gravity is
    and how effectively it is spreading the work.

  • Re: Europe's Largest Space Corp to launch Solar Power Satellite
    So would I; this is the first time I've heard lasers floated as a
    serious proposal rather than microwaves, although the laser concept has
    been discussed from time-to-time.
    It's clumsy though, as it works like this: Sunlight > electrical power >
    laser generation > laser reception > steam turbine > electrical power.

  • Re: curved spacetime
    The one aether flow is where flowing energy and its fields of matter
    and light are.
    Mitch Raemsch

  • Re: Was Einstein indeed "Very Great"?
    Hate to tell you, most scientist are not "great". I didn't say it was
    wrong, I said Einstein was not great. See the subject line? That's what
    the grown up were discussing before you entered the conversation.
    And Schrödinger didn't solve every problem in QM, either. He just
    provided the means to do so. Schrödinger is great, Einstein isn't.

  • Re: curved spacetime
    Energy flows through gravity. Its aether rates slow down by energy
    speed through space and gravity strength in space. The two aether
    rates come together as one aether flow direction over the energy and
    field. This Aether flows in the direction of matter's flow through
    space.
    Mitch Raemsch

  • Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
    In AD, the pressure associated with the aether displaced by massive
    objects is gravity. The faster a clock moves with respect to the
    aether the greater the pressure associated with the aether on the
    clock the slower the clock ticks.
    An atomic clock 'ticks' based upon the aether pressure it exists in.

  • Re: Let's design a fake Perpetual Motion machine
    That's why Nymnuts will never leave. He's always 'disturbed'.

  • Re: Was Einstein indeed "Very Great"?
    Most of physics is people making great discoveries by plugging and
    chugging on other people's theories, with very real little added content.
    That's all the photo electric effect was, a plug and chug. As for the bad
    argument about being first makes you special... if you can't see what's
    wrong with that, then you're not schooled in logic.

  • Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
    In my model Aether flows over flowing energy and field without any
    pressure. And time flows nowhere else that is empty but only over
    particle and field.
    Mitch Raemsch

  • Re: The Ultimate 9-11 Kook
    NAME ONE THING that he has mischaracterized, Kurly Kook.
    And while we're at it, NAME ONE THING on the kooksite link that you
    "think" is true. We'll start there.
    As I love to say about 9/11 kooks, "You can't and you won't."

  • Re: Loonyrod's Lies Re- Loonyrod's Lies, and More Lies
    [link]
    ______________________________ _____
    A google search isn't an answer to a question about what YOU believe.
    Why won't you tell us what you believe to be the TRUTH?
    This is a serious question. Why won't you answer questions about what you

  • Re: Re-investigate 9-11 says Washington Post
    I am not asking about what other critics believe. I am asking what you
    believe.
    What is your theory? What do you believe to be the "truth" ?
    Tell us what you think happened on 9/11.
    Lets start with the two things that flew into the twin towers.
    Were they the commercial flights the government claimed?

  • Re: From Where the WTC Nutbaggery Starts - Delusional Mind of Ironhead
    No.
    The whole concept of the "force" with which one floor hits another is a
    nonsense. What "force" does a bullet weighing 10 grams and travelling at
    1000 m/s hit a wall? Its a serious question.
    The answer is that it can be almost any value at all, depending upon
    assumptions about how the materials deform when they collide.

  • Re: A constant speed of light in all reference frames? Surely you can't be serious.
    Due to the change in the pressure associated with the aether.

  • Re: Two times
    Speed and gravity strength sets the two rates.
    Two times is the smartest concept.
    Time aether flows over matter and light.
    Mitch Raemsch

  • Tsvangirai asks how you confront a dictator using democratic means
    Tsvangirai asks how you confront a dictator using democratic means
    [link]
    By Lance Guma
    12 March 2010
    Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai has stated for the first time what many
    Zimbabweans quietly acknowledge - how do you confront a dictator using
    democratic means? Speaking at the launch of a damning report on the use of

  • Politically motivated violence erupts in Mudzi
    Politically motivated violence erupts in Mudzi
    [link]
    By Violet Gonda
    12 March 2010
    The MDC has accused ZANU PF of unleashing violence against its supporters in
    the Mudzi area in Mashonaland East, despite the fact that there is now an
    inclusive government which should have seen an end to hostilities between

  • Re: Europe was wrong I was right.
    In article
    <58b90a20-c285-4561-84eb-022e1 19f1...@u15g2000prd.googlegrou ps.com>,
    There is much better evidence for the existence of black holes than for
    any gods capable of protecting us from them.
    Which god would that you claim which will prevent the eventual death of
    our sun and stave off colliion with earth of all those planetoids and

  • Re: From Where the WTC Nutbaggery Starts - Delusional Mind of Ironhead
    Ahh yes, but what speed does it actually fall at?
    Only somebody with no knowledge of physics would even bother to analyse this
    in the "energy domain". The collisions between floors are inelastic, so as I
    hope you remember from high school physics that momentum is conserved in the
    system, but not energy. Using momentum allows you to exactly calculate the

  • Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Mar 2010 Washington, DC
    [snip]
    [snip rest]
    1) Japanese teenagers.
    2) Decade of intense exposure.
    3) Bullshit.

  • Re: Europe was wrong I was right.
    Cite!
    What experiments? Cite!
    Nutter alert!
    More nutters! *whoop whoop*

  • Re: Einstein was right (again) - Read and weep kooks
    [snip crap] and give a hand to Clive Robinson that self
    anointed Einstein Dingleberry. Give Live Clive a good
    hand so that he is encouraged to enjoy his dangling in
    the breeze of the farts that come out of Albert's sphincter...
    ahahahaha.. ahahahahaha..
    Thanks for the laughs, you fanatically religious Dingleberry.

  • Re: Europe was wrong I was right.
    If black holes existed it would be our ultimate demise. But they don't
    exist. What will kill us next?
    God is not going to let mankind die. The same with all intelligent
    worlds.
    Mitch Raemsch

  • Re: The Ultimate 9-11 Insider (s)
    On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:43 +0000, moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.co m
    news.php?q=1207934314
    Why would you expect anyone to respond to your rants and
    mischaracterizations?

  • Re: From Where the WTC Nutbaggery Starts - Delusional Mind of Ironhead
    Why don't you calculate the actual rate of a pancake collapse, post the
    maths here, and show that the WTC buildings could not possibly have had a
    pancake collapse because they fell too fast?
    This would be unequivocal proof that NIST was wrong about the pancake
    collapse, and you could do the whole thing in a few minutes with a