- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
is
A team of scientists working under the direction of researchers from the
University of Sussex have recently discovered that Einstein did not say
"inertial".
[link]
Perhaps you are referring to some other relativistic inertial relativity,
since all you moronic trolls have your own version.
- Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
On Sep 1, 11:39 pm, "Peter Webb"
my personal opinion is that whatever happened, the Official Version is
a lie intended to cast a fog over the entire matter.
(it's working!)
the Powers That Be know that the majority of the citixenry are
predisposed to believe anything that is Official and that the rest can
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
Guess
most
Porat's English is commensurate with your mathematics.
He is syntactically incorrect and you are just another nonsense-writing
Jabberwock. It'll be an historic day when you realise what nonsense is,
not that a fuckwit like you ever will.
- a recalibration once the breakdown is found Re: key log-spiral is the canyon-channel log spiral #888 Correcting Math
Now also I have to mention a recalibration once the breakdown occurs.
What I mean is that in the line row stacking I have huge squares
progressively outward from a straight line starting
at 0 so the first square if 1, the second is 1, the third is 2, the
fourth is 6, the fifth is 24 and so on. So that the distance covered
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
That P = hf/c is the case for all inertial frames of reference is a
relativistic idea, of course, because relativity says the speed of light is
c in all inertial frames. Newtonian physics would say P photon = hf /
(c+v). So that shows it mathematically.
No idea who particularly said or wrote it first .. but it would have been
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
2
please show us MATHEMATICALLY
and histirocally that
that
P photon = hf/c -----
---was stemming out of the theory of relativity
3
who was the first one who coined that formula
and how ??
(actually the first shape of it was
p=h / Lambda )
TIA
Y.Porat
----------------------------
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
A brillig reply by Androcles
This is an historic day .. Porat is finally correct about something. Guess
if he keeps making enough allegations, one of them may eventually turn out
to be correct. Porat uses the 'infinite number of monkeys' method for most
things he writes.
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
On Sep 2, 11:20 am, "Androcles"
wrote:
------------------
BYE
PSYCHO
now it is 100 percent clear to me
that you are a psycho
--------------------
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
So, just to confirm, you too are a worthless idiotic fuckwit?
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
opinion
So, just to confirm, you are a worthless idiotic fuckwit?
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
-----------------
Andro
i dont understand
===================
You don't want to, either.
[link]
Do moMe rAths outGrabe, you fuckin¬ jabberwock!! Yes or no!!!
Please let it be clear????
- Re: EINSTEINIANA'S ACHILLES' HEEL
Consider David Morin's assertion on p. 3:
[link]
p. 3: "The receiver and this next pulse then travel toward each other
at relative speed c+v (as measured by someone in S)."
What is the relative speed of the receiver and "this next pulse" as
- Re: Bloody meteorite?
All you need to know about this guy!
[link]
- Re: Electtron Microscope
Have you heard of quantum mechanics?
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
Someone who's dealt with him before .. and someone who is not a troll.
Nope
I didn't say you were. But I did say Androcles is a troll .. do you
disagree?
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
And who the hell are you to talk anyway?
Isn't this a bit of the "relativistic" pot calling the kettle black, saying
that I am being sucked in by a troll ?
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
-----------------
Andro
i dont understand your new mad obsession
with me ?
i never attacked you
and a long many years had nothing to do with you
before you started attacking me
so ??
just ellus the through t what is you **real
sane rational motivation
for that ??
it is certainly not my English that bothers you in this
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
Why the fuck are you asking questions when you clearly do NOT want and won't
accept the answers? Really .. WHAT IS THE POINT !!!!
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
-----------------
pigshit psychopath crook
if your name id PD
let us know about it
i dont discuss with little Josef Goebbels
i wil dsucuss it as for now
only with PD
he dos not need your help
unless he is PD with an anonymous name --
Inertial !!
or hiding behind you !!
and if he will answer exactly as you
- Re: OT: Re-thinking the Internet with security and mobility in mind
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:45:16 -0500, Sam Wormley
wrote:
News here about software that allows mobile phones to configure
themselves into a distributed network.
[link]
More information here:
[link]
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
------------------
imbecile chemist philosopher
in real physics we dont have points
we have objects !!
a point is a mathematical concept
it is not a physical concept
our physical world i snot comopsed of points
point are not natures invention
it is a human invention!!
------------------------------
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY - Androcles shows he's nothing but a heckling troll
That was my intention. Or rather, to prove that to be true.
After 5 requests he says what he believes, and 5 responses like the above, I
can rest my case.
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
Because he's a troll. He does have a wicked and cruel (and sometimes even
clever) sense of humour on occasion .. so he has at least one redeeming
quality. But mostly he's just a troll who is almost completely ignorant
about maths. logic, and physics. It doesn't take most people long to work
that out, although sometimes he gets some poor fool who will try to 'learn'
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
So why are you always shooting your mouth off about Relativity when you
can't answer the simplest questions about it?
- Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
Occam's razor.
Kook.
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
Don't try to teach Porat English, he doesn't want to learn and has
declared his intention not to learn.
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
Porat not understanding is no surprise
As has been done over and over and over .. yet Porat keeps asking
c being constant is a relativistic concept
c is a relativistic speed, as it is is significant proportion of c. at speed
c Newtonian physics and Relativistic physics are very different.
That expression makes no sense. 'Relativistic' is an adjective .. it is not
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY - Androcles shows he's nothing but a heckling troll
So, just to confirm, you too are a worthless idiotic fuckwit?
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY - Androcles shows he's nothing but a heckling troll
There you go, Peter ... Androcles demonstrates that he is nothing but a
heckling troll and does not have an actual opinion of his own on anything.
Though his replies to Porat twere brillig.
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
your
doubt.
So, just to confirm, you are a worthless idiotic fuckwit?
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
-------------------
YEs .. that is what the theory of relativity says .. and so c being constant
is relativistic
'relativistic to' is grammatical nonsense. There is no such valid
combination of words
You confuse it with 'related to' and 'relative to'
No .. you've been given the definitions and deliberately ignored them
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
No .. you simply cannot understand well-formed English, especially when it
relates to physics. English is not your native language and you are quite
frankly abysmal at it.
No .. you simply understood nothing. There is a big difference.
[snip more unfounded libellous allegations from moron Porat]
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
You've been told. The notion of c being a constant in all frames is
relativistic. 'c' is a relativistic speed.
'relativistic' does not mean 'to relate things'.
You've been given the dictionary physics meanings of the term 'relativistic'
(see below as well). It does NOT mean what you want it to.
- Re: New Volcanos Erupting This Week: 4 — Total Active: 17
:-)
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
Ummm ... so you don't even have an opinion on whether Relativity makes
correct predictions?
Why are you always going on about it, if you don't even have an opinion on
whether it is correct?
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
----------------
You've asked this and been given the answer .. yet you refuse to listen to
any answers until someone happens to tell you what you want to hear.
This is NOT how to learn.
Your use of the word 'relativistic ' is not correct in ANY sense. You've
been given the dictionary physics meaning of the term and you ignore it.
- Re: An experiment that was never done !!...
On Sep 1, 4:37 pm, PD
------------------------
============================== =======
and now i dont understand you at all!!
so let us make it simple clear: once and for all
is c relativistic or not ?
it is a dead simple question that should have
a dead simple answer
no need for long speeches!!
- Re: Bloody meteorite?
You're the delusional and powerless Wrecked Fossil.
- Re: Bloody meteorite?
You should quit abusing chemicals. Stat.
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
-------------------
so
c is a CONSTANT
and relativistic to nothing but to itself
AND THAT IS BY DEFINITION !!
got it blockheads retarded imbeciles crooks
let all retarded crooks know
YOU CANT DO ANY PHYSICS
UNLESS YOU CAN BASE IT ON SOME CONSTANTS!!
if you dont have constants in your physics
(SCIENCE !!)-
- Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
LOL....a faint cry of sanity amongst the nutters. :)
When you ask simple questions like these, your likely responses will
vary from having your post snipped to change the wording/meaning, a
complete change of subject (But,but,but what about WTC7?) or just more
cut'n'pastes.
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
now it is crystal clear
Andro
is a registered Psychopath !!!
btw
the combination of a psycho with a crook
is extremely dangerous and harmful !! (:-)
============================== ==
[link]
Do moMe rAths outGrabe, you fuckin¬ jabberwock!! Yes or no!!!
Please let it be clear????
- Re: EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY
be
opinion,
So, just to confirm, you are a worthless idiotic fuckwit?
- Re: New Volcanos Erupting This Week: 4 — Total Active: 17
This is good news. More volcanic activity means
more micro-sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere
which means more solar radiation reflected back
into space. Volcanoes = global cooling.
- key log-spiral is the canyon-channel log spiral #887 Correcting Math
Alright the stacking of the straightedge against the wall of these
squares
1
1
2
6
24
120
720
5040
40320
362880
3628800
39916800
And the near 0 degree and near 90 degree log spirals will traverse the
full distance
through each of the squares.
But now, here is a problem of uniformity of experiment, so we want
- Re: Speed of light relative to what?
now it is crystal clear
Andro
is a registered Psychopath !!!
btw
the combination of a psycho with a crook
is extremely dangerous and harmful !! (:-)
Y.P
----------------
- Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
Do you believe that on 9/11 four commercial jetliners were hijacked and
flown into the WTC buildings, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania?
After all the research you have done on this subject, you must surely have
an opinion as to whether 4 planes were hijacked.
What is it? What is the TRUTH? Were 4 planes hijacked on 9/11 ? In your
- Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
Do you believe that on 9/11 four commercial jetliners were hijacked and
flown into the WTC buildings, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania?
After all the research you have done on this subject, you must surely have
an opinion as to whether 4 planes were hijacked.
What is it? What is the TRUTH? Were 4 planes hijacked on 9/11 ? In your
- Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
So were their hijackers on board the planes?
- Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
Do you believe that on 9/11 four commercial jetliners were hijacked and
flown into the WTC buildings, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania?
After all the research you have done on this subject, you must surely have
an opinion as to whether 4 planes were hijacked.
What is it? What is the TRUTH? Were 4 planes hijacked on 9/11 ? In your
|
Newsgroups